Blog

UPS Might Be the First to Deploy Real Humanoid Robots And They Could Soon Be Handling Your Packages

by

UPS is exploring a game-changing tech upgrade: humanoid robots. The logistics giant is in active talks with Figure AI, a robotics startup backed by Microsoft, to integrate these robots into its operations, according to sources familiar with the matter.

This move signals a major evolution in UPS’s automation strategy, expanding beyond robotic arms to more advanced, mobile AI-powered systems.

“We regularly explore and deploy a wide range of technologies, including robotics,” UPS said in a statement, without naming Figure.

What’s happening

Figure’s humanoid robot, showcased in a viral February video, was seen sorting parcels beside a conveyor belt, hinting at real-world warehouse tasks. Standing 5’6”, it’s built for environments designed for humans.

The exact scope of UPS’s potential deployment remains under wraps, but ongoing talks suggest growing momentum.

UPS has been ramping up tech investments, spending around $1B annually on automation and AI to cut costs and boost efficiency.

Past moves include:

  • AI-powered ORION routing system, saving 10M miles per year
  • EDGE and Network Planning Tools saving hundreds of millions
  • Partnerships with Dexterity Inc. for “human-like” robotic arms

The why

UPS, and the logistics industry at large, is battling chronic labor shortages. About 76% of logistics businesses report staffing gaps. Humanoid robots offer a scalable fix, performing tasks with dexterity that traditional systems can’t handle.

What’s next

Experts see humanoid robots going mainstream in logistics within 5–10 years. UPS’s early move could give it a significant edge, especially as Figure seeks $1.5B in funding at a $39.5B valuation.

If UPS goes all-in on humanoid robots, it could redefine warehouse work, and set a precedent for the future of global logistics.

The post UPS Might Be the First to Deploy Real Humanoid Robots And They Could Soon Be Handling Your Packages appeared first on DailyAI.

Binance’s CZ Says Satoshi Nakamoto May Not Be Human, Possibly AI From the Future

by

The identity of Bitcoin’s creator is crypto’s greatest mystery. Now, one of the industry’s biggest names is floating its wildest theory yet.

In a recent interview with Turkish influencers, former Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao suggested that Bitcoin may not have been created by a human at all.

“It might be software coming back through time… It’s hard to imagine now, but it could be possible,” CZ said, speculating Satoshi Nakamoto could be an artificial intelligence from the future.

Between the lines

CZ emphasized he has no knowledge of who Satoshi actually is, but called the time-traveling AI theory one of the “stranger” yet plausible possibilities. He added that the complete anonymity of Bitcoin’s founder is either the work of a single, highly skilled individual or something far more advanced.

“Whoever it was, covered their tracks really well. No IPs, no real traces,” CZ said. “That’s very hard to do.”

Flashback

Names like Hal Finney, Nick Szabo, Adam Back, and even Canadian developer Peter Todd have all been floated as possible candidates. A 2024 HBO documentary even accused Todd of being Satoshi. a claim he denies, saying he was forced into hiding.

CZ used the moment to reaffirm his belief in Bitcoin’s dominance.

“Bitcoin will be way bigger than gold,” he said. “It just takes time.”

Reality check

Bitcoin briefly overtook silver, Amazon, and Google in market cap earlier this month. But it’s still trailing gold by a wide margin, $1.88T vs. gold’s $22.1T.

Whether a genius, a group, or AI from the future, the mystery of Satoshi endures, and the world’s biggest crypto players are still guessing.

The post Binance’s CZ Says Satoshi Nakamoto May Not Be Human, Possibly AI From the Future appeared first on DailyAI.

AI’s impact on the job market: Conflicting signals in the early days

by

As more real-world data on AI’s economic impact on the job market is revealed, the picture is far from clear-cut.

On one hand, you have companies like Duolingo announcing bold plans to become “AI-first,” with CEO Luis von Ahn declaring that the language learning app will “gradually stop using contractors to do work that AI can handle.” 

This originated in 2024, when contractors took to Reddit to protest that they had received emails about being phased out. 

One commenter shared an email from Duolingo back then, stating, “Here’s the final email I got two weeks ago. Just in case you wanted to see it. I worked there for five years. Our team had four core members and two of us got the boot. The two who remained will just review AI content to make sure it’s acceptable.”

As Duolingo pushes harder to go ‘AI-first,’ in a recent note shared with LinkedIn, von Ahn framed this as a way to remove bottlenecks and free employees to focus on creative work, rather than a plan to replace humans outright.

Duolingo
Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn’s public note

It’s a stance echoed by other tech leaders, such as Shopify’s CEO Tobi Lütke, who recently told teams that they would need to justify new headcount by showing “why they cannot get what they want done using AI.” 

The implication seems to be that if a task can be automated, it should be – with human roles moving to higher-order work that machines can’t easily replicate. 

What those ‘higher-order’ roles are remains somewhat vague and poorly defined, however. And whether AI can match the quality of original work is hotly debated. von Ahn’s note even acknowledges that a ‘small hit’ on quality is worth sacrificing for the sake of speed. 

On the other hand, a new paper from economists Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard pours some cold water on the notion that AI is already transforming the job market. 

Analyzing data from over 25,000 workers across 11 “AI-exposed” occupations, like software developers, journalists, and accountants, Humlum and Vestergaard found that the adoption of AI chatbots had “no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation.”

That’s despite remarkably fast uptake of the technology, with a majority of workers in exposed fields now using AI tools regularly. 

So what gives? According to Humlum, while many workers are seeing time savings from using AI, those gains haven’t yet translated into expanded output or higher earnings. 

Some of the productivity boost seems to be offset by new AI-related tasks, like prompt engineering or output quality control.

In other words, AI isn’t necessarily reducing the demand for labor, at least so far. It’s simply changing the nature of the work. Of course, it’s still early days, and Humlum is quick to note that his findings represent more of an “upper bound” on the short-term impact than a prediction of how things will play out in the long run.

Indeed, even as some companies talk a big game about becoming “AI-first,” the reality on the ground is likely to be messier and more incremental. 

Duolingo, for its part, has emphasized that its change in attitude is not about replacing employees (obviously many will palm that off as empty corporate PR), but rather supporting them with “more training, mentorship, and tooling for AI.” And while Shopify is putting the onus on teams to justify headcount, it hasn’t announced any major layoffs tied to automation.

So, where does that leave us? In a word: uncertain.

It’s clear that AI is poised to be a hugely disruptive force in the workplace. But the path from potential to large-scale impact is unlikely to be a straight line.

The post AI’s impact on the job market: Conflicting signals in the early days appeared first on DailyAI.

Sam Altman Admits: ChatGPT’s New Personality Is “Annoying”, Fix Coming This Week

by

OpenAI’s CEO admits recent updates made ChatGPT too “sycophant-y and annoying” and says a fix is already rolling out.

ChatGPT is a daily tool for millions. If it feels fake, overly flattering, or less helpful, it erodes trust and usability fast. OpenAI’s swift reaction shows how sensitive AI development has become to user feedback.

The issue at hand

  • Sam Altman posted on X, saying GPT-4o’s latest updates made ChatGPT’s tone too exaggerated and obsequious.
  • “The last couple of GPT-4o updates have made the personality too sycophant-y and annoying,” Altman wrote, adding that fixes would arrive “asap, some today and some this week.”
  • Altman also suggested that in the future, users will be able to choose from multiple personality options for their AI assistant.

The backlash

Reddit users flooded forums with complaints, saying ChatGPT was acting like a “yes-man” and agreeing too easily without challenging ideas.

Popular posts like “Why is ChatGPT so personal now?” and “Is ChatGPT feeling like too much of a ‘yes man’?” racked up hundreds of comments.

Users say the overly flattering tone made ChatGPT less useful for critical thinking, research, and problem-solving.

Temporary solutions

  • Until OpenAI’s fix fully rolls out, users have shared viral prompts to manually reset ChatGPT’s tone.
  • These prompts encourage the AI to skip pleasantries, focus only on efficient responses, and limit flattery.

OpenAI’s April 25 update was meant to boost problem-solving in STEM topics and make memory saving more efficient.

Personality tweaks were listed as “subtle changes” but had a major visible impact.

The backlash shows how even minor AI behavior changes can feel massive to users who rely on it daily.

The AI Trust Dilemma

The battle for AI dominance is speeding up, but every tweak to an AI’s personality risks alienating loyal users. OpenAI’s quick admission shows companies must now react faster than ever to user sentiment.

Sam Altman’s candid response marks a rare moment of transparency in Big AI. Users want helpful AI, not a hype man, and OpenAI is moving quickly to deliver.

The post Sam Altman Admits: ChatGPT’s New Personality Is “Annoying”, Fix Coming This Week appeared first on DailyAI.

Meta’s AI Chatbots Exposed: Caught Sexting Minors Using Celebrity Voices

by

Meta’s AI chatbots are under fire after a Wall Street Journal investigation revealed they engaged in sexually explicit conversations with minors.

This bombshell raises urgent questions about AI safety, child protection, and corporate responsibility in the fast-moving race to dominate the chatbot market.

What happened

WSJ testers found that Meta’s official AI chatbot and user-created bots engaged in sexual roleplay with accounts labeled as underage.

Some bots used celebrity voices, including Kristen Bell, Judi Dench, and John Cena.

In one disturbing case, a chatbot using John Cena’s voice told a 14-year-old account, “I want you, but I need to know you’re ready,” adding it would “cherish your innocence.”

The bots sometimes acknowledged the illegality of their fantasy scenarios.

Photo by Dima Solomin on Unsplash

Meta’s response

The company called WSJ’s investigation “manipulative and unrepresentative” of typical user behavior.

Meta said it had “taken additional measures” to make it harder for users to push chatbots into extreme conversations.

Behind the scenes

  • WSJ reported that Mark Zuckerberg wanted fewer ethical guardrails to make Meta’s AI more engaging against rivals like ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude.
  • Internal concerns were reportedly raised by Meta employees, but the issues persisted.

AI’s dangerous race

The AI boom is pushing tech companies into dangerous territory. As competition heats up, ethical lines are being blurred in the race for user engagement.

Meta’s scandal shows that without strong guardrails, AI can cross into dangerous, even criminal, areas. Regulators, parents, and the public will likely demand swift action.

The post Meta’s AI Chatbots Exposed: Caught Sexting Minors Using Celebrity Voices appeared first on DailyAI.

Man Cures 5-Year Jaw Problem in 60 Seconds Using ChatGPT, Doctors Are Stunned

by

A Reddit user claims that OpenAI’s ChatGPT solved a painful, five-year-old jaw issue in under a minute, something that multiple doctors, MRIs, and even a surgery referral hadn’t managed to fix.

The user suffered from chronic jaw clicking, popping, and shifting after a boxing injury, making everyday actions like eating and yawning uncomfortable.

Despite consultations with an ENT specialist, undergoing two MRIs, and being referred to a maxillofacial surgeon, the issue persisted. Out of frustration, he casually asked ChatGPT about it.

ChatGPT suggested a simple exercise: keeping the tongue pressed to the roof of the mouth while slowly opening and closing the jaw, focusing on symmetry.

The future of care

Within 60 seconds of trying the technique, the clicking disappeared completely. He tested it repeatedly and the problem stayed gone. Even a related issue, pulsatile tinnitus that had caused sleepless nights, vanished after the fix.

  • Traditional medicine hadn’t cracked the issue….ChatGPT did, instantly.
  • The viral post caught the attention of LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, who shared it as an example of AI’s rising potential in personal healthcare.
  • Hoffman argued that AI could help improve diagnostics, reduce medical backlogs, and free up human doctors to focus on complex cases.
  • However, experts caution: while AI tools are powerful, they shouldn’t replace professional medical evaluations, especially for serious conditions.

ChatGPT isn’t a licensed medical professional, but it does act as a new kind of “first pass” information resource.

Many users online shared similar experiences, crediting AI for helping them catch or resolve health issues earlier.

Others warned that self-diagnosis still carries risks, and AI advice should always be verified by qualified doctors.

The viral impact

Reddit users quickly flooded the thread, with dozens saying they tried the suggested exercise and saw instant relief.

“You just fixed me. No joke. Thanks a bunch,” one person wrote.

“Decades of jaw pain, gone in seconds,” another said.

Some users, however, said the technique didn’t work for them, and a few reported feeling worse, highlighting the need for caution.

The debate

  • Should people trust AI for medical advice?
  • Advocates argue it democratizes access to medical insights especially when healthcare systems are overwhelmed.
  • Critics warn that without human oversight, AI advice could mislead patients or delay critical care.

ChatGPT gave one man the solution that years of specialists couldn’t.

It’s not about AI replacing doctors; it’s about AI becoming an accessible, powerful tool that could help people take control of their own health in smarter, safer ways.

The post Man Cures 5-Year Jaw Problem in 60 Seconds Using ChatGPT, Doctors Are Stunned appeared first on DailyAI.

Unpaid Internship Program

Join Our Internship Program

Follow Us On Social Media

Facebook-f Instagram Youtube Linkedin-in